https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14013-3
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
Modified gravity/dynamical dark energy vs
CDM: is the game over?
1
Institut de Ciències de l’Espai, ICE/CSIC-IEEC, Campus UAB, Carrer de Can Magrans s/n, 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
2
Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Passeig Luis Companys, 23, 08010, Barcelona, Spain
3
Department of Theoretical, Atomic and Optical Physics, and Laboratory for Disruptive Interdisciplinary Science (LaDIS), University of Valladolid UVA, Campus Miguel Delibes, Paseo Belén, 7, 47011, Valladolid, Spain
4
Department of Physics, Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), C.P. 6030, Campus do Pici, 60455-760, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
5
Tver State University, Sadovyj per. 35, 170002, Tver, Russia
6
International Laboratory for Theoretical Cosmology, Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics (TUSUR), 634050, Tomsk, Russia
Received:
28
January
2025
Accepted:
27
February
2025
Published online:
14
March
2025
Over the last decades, tests on the standard model of cosmology, the so-called CDM model, have been widely analysed and compared with many different models for describing dark energy. Modified gravities have played an important role in this sense as an alternative to
CDM model. Previous observational data has been always favouring
CDM model in comparison to any other model. While statistically speaking, alternative models have shown their power, fitting in some cases the observational data slightly better than
CDM, the significance and goodness of the fits were not significantly relevant to exclude the standard model of cosmology. In this paper, a generalisation of exponential F(R) gravity is considered and compared with
CDM model by using the latest observational data. Also some well-known model independent parameterisations for the equation of state (EoS) of dark energy are explored. These scenarios are confronted with the renewed observational data involving the Pantheon plus datasets of supernovae type Ia, the Hubble parameter estimations, data from the cosmic microwave background and baryon acoustic oscillations, where the latter includes the data provided by Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument Collaboration. Results of this analysis suggest that standard exponential F(R) models provide much better fits than
CDM model, which is excluded at 4
. Moreover, the parameterisations of the equation of state suggest a non-constant EoS parameter for dark energy, where
CDM model is also excluded at 4
.
© The Author(s) 2025
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Funded by SCOAP3.