https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14152-7
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
Non-extensive entropy and holographic thermodynamics: topological insights
School of Physics, Damghan University, 3671641167, Damghan, Iran
a saeed.noorigashti@stu.umz.ac.ir, saeed.noorigashti70@gmail.com
Received:
31
January
2025
Accepted:
1
April
2025
Published online:
18
April
2025
In this paper, we delve into the thermodynamic topology of AdS Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet black holes, employing non-extensive entropy formulations such as Barrow, Rényi, and Sharma–Mittal entropy within two distinct frameworks: bulk boundary and restricted phase space (RPS) thermodynamics. Our findings reveal that in the bulk boundary framework, the topological charges, influenced by the free parameters and the Barrow non-extensive parameter , exhibit significant variability. Specifically, we identify three topological charges
. When the parameter
increases to 0.9, the classification changes, resulting in two topological charges
. When
is set to zero, the equations reduce to the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy structure, yielding consistent results with three topological charges. Additionally, setting the non-extensive parameter
in Rényi entropy to zero increases the number of topological charges, but the total topological charge remains (W = +1). The presence of the Rényi non-extensive parameter alters the topological behavior compared to the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy. Sharma–Mittal entropy shows different classifications and the various numbers of topological charges influenced by the non-extensive parameters
and
. When
and
have values close to each other, three topological charges with a total topological charge
are observed. Varying one parameter while keeping the other constant significantly changes the topological classification and number of topological charges. In contrast, the RPS framework demonstrates remarkable consistency in topological behavior. Under all conditions and for all free parameters, the topological charge remains
with the total topological charge
. This uniformity persists even when reduced to Bekenstein–Hawking entropy, suggesting that the RPS framework provides a stable environment for studying black hole thermodynamics across different entropy models. These findings underscore the importance of considering various entropy formulations and frameworks to gain a comprehensive understanding of black hole thermodynamics.
© The Author(s) 2025
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Funded by SCOAP3.