https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13551-6
Regular Article
CONUS+ Experiment
1
Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Saupfercheckweg 1, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany
2
PreussenElektra GmbH, Kernkraftwerk Brokdorf, Osterende, 25576, Brokdorf, Germany
3
Kernkraftwerk Leibstadt AG, 5325, Leibstadt, Switzerland
4
Duke University, 27708, Durham, NC, USA
5
Paul Scherrer Institut, Forschungsstrasse 111, 5232, Villigen, Switzerland
Received:
25
July
2024
Accepted:
27
October
2024
Published online:
6
December
2024
The CONUS+ experiment aims to detect coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CENS) of reactor antineutrinos on germanium nuclei in the fully coherent regime, continuing on this way the CONUS physics program started at the Brokdorf nuclear power plant, Germany. The CONUS+ setup is installed in the nuclear power plant in Leibstadt, Switzerland, at a distance of 20.7 m from the 3.6 GW thermal power reactor core. The CE
NS signature will be measured with the same four point-contact high-purity germanium (HPGe) detectors produced for the former experiment, however refurbished and with optimized low energy thresholds of about 160
. To suppress the background in the CONUS+ detectors, the passive and active layers of the original CONUS shield were modified such to fit better to the significantly changed background conditions at the new experimental location. New data acquisition and monitoring systems were developed. A direct network connection between the experiment and the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) makes it possible to control and monitor data acquisition in real time. The impact of all these modifications is discussed with particular emphasis on the resulting CE
NS signal prediction for the first data collection phase of CONUS+. Prospects of the planned upgrade in a second phase integrating new larger HPGe detectors are also discussed.
The original HTML-version of this article was revised. In this article the affiliation details for the authors K. Fülber, J. Hakenmüller, K. Ni , M. Rank, E. Sánchez García, I. Stalder, H. Strecker, R. Wink and J. Woenckhaus were incorrectly given.
An erratum to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13705-6.
© The Author(s) 2024
corrected publication 2024
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Funded by SCOAP3.