https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13038-4
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
Constructing model-agnostic likelihoods, a method for the reinterpretation of particle physics results
1
Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, 85748, Garching b. München, Germany
2
Technical University Munich, 85748, Garching b. München, Germany
3
Theoretische Physik 1, Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Universität Siegen, 57068, Siegen, Germany
4
Institut für Experimentelle Teilchenphysik, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany
5
Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology and Department of Physics, Durham University, DH1 3LE, Durham, UK
a
lorenz.gaertner@physik.uni-muenchen.de
Received:
20
February
2024
Accepted:
22
June
2024
Published online:
14
July
2024
Experimental High Energy Physics has entered an era of precision measurements. However, measurements of many of the accessible processes assume that the final states’ underlying kinematic distribution is the same as the Standard Model prediction. This assumption introduces an implicit model-dependency into the measurement, rendering the reinterpretation of the experimental analysis complicated without reanalysing the underlying data. We present a novel reweighting method in order to perform reinterpretation of particle physics measurements. It makes use of reweighting the Standard Model templates according to kinematic signal distributions of alternative theoretical models, prior to performing the statistical analysis. The generality of this method allows us to perform statistical inference in the space of theoretical parameters, assuming different kinematic distributions, according to a beyond Standard Model prediction. We implement our method as an extension to the pyhf software and interface it with the EOS software, which allows us to perform flavor physics phenomenology studies. Furthermore, we argue that, beyond the pyhf or HistFactory likelihood specification, only minimal information is necessary to make a likelihood model-agnostic and hence easily reinterpretable. We showcase that publishing such likelihoods is crucial for a full exploitation of experimental results.
© The Author(s) 2024
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Funded by SCOAP3.
