https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10849-1
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
Minimal length, nuclear matter, and neutron stars
1
Department of General Education, Faculty of Art and Sciences, Sampoerna University, 12780, Jakarta, Indonesia
2
IoT and Physics Lab, Sampoerna University, 12780, Jakarta, Indonesia
3
Prodi Sains Atmosfer dan Keplanetan, Jurusan Sains Institut Teknologi Sumatera, 35365, Lampung Selatan, Indonesia
4
Observatorium Astronomi ITERA Lampung, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, 35365, Lampung Selatan, Indonesia
5
Theoretical High Energy Physics Research Division, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jl. Ganesha 10, 40132, Bandung, Indonesia
6
Departemen Fisika FMIPA Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI, 16424, Depok, Indonesia
a
ilham.prasetyo@sampoernauniversity.ac.id
Received:
5
August
2022
Accepted:
25
September
2022
Published online:
7
October
2022
In this paper, we employ one variant of the Generalized Uncertainty Principle (GUP) model, i.e., the Kempf–Mangano–Mann (KMM) model, and discuss the impact of GUP on the EoS of nuclear and neutron star matter based on the relativistic mean field (RMF) model. We input the result in the Serrano–Liška (SL) gravity theory to discuss the corresponding Neutron Star (NS) properties. We have shown that the upper bound for the GUP parameter from nuclear matter properties is MeV. If we used this upper bound to calculate NS matter, and considering SL parameter as an independent parameter, we have found that the upper bound for the SL parameter, which modifies the Einstein field equation, is m. This beta upper bound is determined by considering the anisotropy magnitude smaller than the pressure magnitude. By employing MeV and m, we obtain the mass–radius relation that satisfies NICER data for both PSR J0740+6620 (whose mass is ) and PSR J0030+0451 (). Our GUP parameter upper bound perfectly matches the constraint from Rb cold-atom-recoil experiment. If we consider that the same strength from the additional logarithmic term in the entropy from both GUP and SL model are dependent, for MeV, it is clear that SL parameter lower bound is m. The magnitude of this bound is smaller than the upper bound magnitude of SL parameter considering as independent parameter i.e., m.
© The Author(s) 2022
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Funded by SCOAP3. SCOAP3 supports the goals of the International Year of Basic Sciences for Sustainable Development.