Open Access
Published online: 24 November 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1208-7
Published online: 24 November 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1184-y
Published online: 10 December 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1224-7
Published online: 28 November 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1216-7
Published online: 24 November 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1215-8
Published online: 24 November 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1212-y
Published online: 24 November 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1214-9
Published online: 03 December 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1199-4
Published online: 10 December 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1220-y
Published online: 17 November 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1206-9
Published online: 24 November 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1200-2
Published online: 20 October 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1163-3
NNLO corrections to
Published online: 26 November 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1210-0
Published online: 25 November 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1213-x
Published online: 25 November 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1211-z
Published online: 14 November 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1186-9
Published online: 14 November 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1201-1
Published online: 08 December 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1222-9
Published online: 31 October 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1176-y
Published online: 10 December 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1223-8
Published online: 02 December 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1218-5
Published online: 10 December 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1221-x
Published online: 21 November 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1194-9
Open Access
Published online: 01 December 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1202-0
Published online: 08 January 2010
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1230-9
Open Access
Erratum
Published online: 02 December 2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1217-6
Editors-in-Chief
G. Dissertori, J. Monroe, D. J. Schwarz, K. Skenderis and G. Zanderighi
We are grateful to the Editor, to the Referee for careful reading of the manuscript, for the interesting and useful remarks, which allow us to improve the text and clarify some of the results.