Investigation of the Z boson production via hadron–hadron collisions in the and -factorization frameworks

S. Rezaie; M. Modarres

doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11783-6

2023 Impact factor 4.2

Particles and Fields

Open Access

Eur. Phys. J. C (2023) 83: 678
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11783-6

Regular Article - Theoretical Physics

Investigation of the Z boson production via hadron–hadron collisions in the $k_{t}$ and $(z, k_{t})$ -factorization frameworks

S. Rezaie and M. Modarres^b

Department of Physics, University of Tehran, 1439955961, Tehran, Iran

^b mmodares@ut.ac.ir

Received: 13 March 2023
Accepted: 30 June 2023
Published online: 29 July 2023

Abstract

In this paper, we study the Z boson production via the proton–proton (p–p) collisions within the $k_{t}$ $$k_t$$ and $(z, k_{t})$ $$(z, k_t)$$ -factorization frameworks, using the Martin–Ryskin–Watt (MRW) unintegrated parton distribution functions (UPDFs) and the double unintegrated parton distribution functions (DUPDFs), respectively. For calculation of the differential cross section (DCS) within the $k_{t}$ $$k_t$$ -factorization ( $k_{t}$ $$k_t$$ is the partonic transverse momentum), the KATIE parton level event generator is used, while for the $(z, k_{t})$ $$(z, k_t)$$ -factorization, the DCS is directly computed. Up to the tree level partonic next-to-leading order (NLO) are included, beside the inclusion of branching ratios, in our calculation. It should be noted that Martin, Ryskin and Watt are originally calculated the same process, i.e., the Z boson production, within the $(z, k_{t})$ $$(z, k_t)$$ -factorization framework, while including only the lowest order tree level partonic sub-process. However, the present report extends their work from two perspectives. First, the additional sub-processes are included, second, for the processes up to the next-to-leading order (NLO), a direct calculation by considering the final state leptons is imposed. Finally, we compare our results with the $13 T e V$ $13\; TeV$ data of the ATLAS, LHCb, CMS collaborations, the corresponding collinear factorization predictions and the Modarres, et al. reports. Our p–p DCS calculations show that the $k_{t}$ $$k_t$$ and $(z, k_{t})$ $$(z, k_t)$$ -factorizations frameworks give relatively the same behavior in the central rapidity regions. While at the large rapidity regions, the $(z, k_{t})$ -factorization, predicts the p–p DCS closer to the experimental data with respect to those of $k_{t}$ $$k_t$$ -factorization framework.

© The Author(s) 2023

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.