DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s2003-01136-2
Confronting spectral functions from
e+e- annihilation and
decays:
consequences for the muon magnetic moment
M. Davier1, S. Eidelman2, A. Höcker1 and Z. Zhang1
1 Laboratoire de l'Accélérateur Linéaire, IN2P3-CNRS et Université de Paris-Sud, 91898 Orsay, France
2 Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia
(Received: 27 August 2002 / Revised version: 10 January 2003 / Published online: 26 February 2003 )
Abstract
Vacuum polarization integrals involve the vector spectral functions which
can be experimentally determined from two sources:
(i)
e+e- annihilation cross sections and (ii) hadronic
decays. Recently results with comparable precision have become available
from CMD-2 on one side, and ALEPH, CLEO and OPAL on the other. The comparison
of the respective spectral functions involves a correction from
isospin-breaking effects, which is evaluated. After the correction
it is found that the dominant
spectral functions do not
agree within experimental and theoretical uncertainties. Some
disagreement is also found for the
spectral functions.
The consequences of these discrepancies for vacuum polarization
calculations are presented, with the emphasis on
the muon anomalous magnetic moment. The work includes a complete
re-evaluation of all exclusive cross sections, taking into account
the most recent data that became available in particular from the
Novosibirsk experiments and applying corrections for the missing
radiative corrections. The values found for the lowest-order
hadronic vacuum polarization contributions are
![\begin{eqnarray*}a_\mu^{\rm had,LO} = \left\{
\begin{array}{ll}
(684.7\pm6.0_{...
...)})~10^{-10}
&~~[\tau {\rm -based}]~, \\
\end{array} \right.
\end{eqnarray*}](/articles/epjc/abs/2003/06/100520497/img4.gif)
where the errors have been separated according to their sources: experimental, missing radiative corrections in e+e- data, and isospin breaking. The Standard Model predictions for the muon magnetic anomaly read
![\begin{eqnarray*}a_\mu = \left\{
\begin{array}{ll}
(11\,659\,169.3\pm7.0_{\rm ...
...W})~10^{-10}
&~~[\tau {\rm -based}]~, \\
\end{array} \right.
\end{eqnarray*}](/articles/epjc/abs/2003/06/100520497/img5.gif)
where the errors account for the hadronic, light-by-light scattering and electroweak contributions. We observe deviations with the recent BNL measurement at the 3.0 ( e+e-) and 0.9 (


© Società Italiana di Fisica, Springer-Verlag 2003