https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15595-2
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
Galileon versus quintessence: a comparative phase space analysis and late-time cosmic relevance
1
Department of Physics, Integral University, 226026, Lucknow, India
2
Department of General and Theoretical Physics, L. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, 010008, Astana, Kazakhstan
a
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Received:
2
January
2026
Accepted:
22
March
2026
Published online:
4
April
2026
Abstract
We perform a comparative phase space analysis of the light mass Galileon model and standard quintessence in the context of late-time cosmic acceleration. Focusing on a spatially flat FLRW background, we consider a cubic Galileon interaction supplemented by a scalar potential and examine three representative choices of the potential: a generalized cosh potential, a simple cosh potential, and a linear potential. By introducing suitable dimensionless variables, the cosmological field equations are reformulated as an autonomous dynamical system, allowing a systematic investigation of the stationary points and their stability properties. For the light mass Galileon scenario, we find that although the phase space admits scalar field dominated solutions, all critical points are of saddle type for the potentials considered. In particular, no stable late-time accelerating attractor emerges, even in the presence of de-Sitter like configurations. In contrast, the quintessence limit admits stable de-Sitter attractors for cosh potentials, providing a viable description of the observed late-time acceleration. Our results highlight a key qualitative distinction between Galileon and quintessence cosmologies and indicate that, within the light mass Galileon framework, the higher-order Galileon interactions may be required to realize a stable accelerating Universe.
© The Author(s) 2026
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Funded by SCOAP3.
