https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14440-2
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
Extended geometric trinity of gravity
1
Dipartimento di Fisica “E. Pancini”, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, Via Cinthia Edificio 6, 80126, Naples, Italy
2
Scuola Superiore Meridionale, Largo San Marcellino 10, 80138, Naples, Italy
3
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Napoli, Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, Via Cinthia Edificio 6, 80126, Naples, Italy
Received:
11
March
2025
Accepted:
18
June
2025
Published online:
1
September
2025
Extensions of equivalent representations of gravity are discussed in the metric-affine framework. First, we focus on: (i) General Relativity, based upon the metric tensor whose dynamics is given by the Ricci curvature scalar R; (ii) the Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity, based on tetrads and spin connection whose dynamics is given by the torsion scalar T; (iii) the Symmetric Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity, formulated with respect to both the metric tensor and the affine connection and characterized by the non-metric scalar Q with the role of gravitational field. They represent the so-called Geometric Trinity of Gravity, because, even if based on different frameworks and different dynamical variables, such as curvature, torsion, and non-metricity, they express the same gravitational dynamics. Starting from this framework, we construct their extensions with the aim to study possible equivalence. We discuss the straightforward extension of General Relativity, the f(R) gravity, where f(R) is an arbitrary function of the Ricci scalar. With this paradigm in mind, we take into account f(T) and f(Q) extensions showing that they are not equivalent to f(R). Dynamical equivalence is achieved if boundary terms are considered, that is
and
theories. The latter are the extensions of Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity and Symmetric Teleparallel of General Relativity, respectively. We obtain that f(R),
, and
form the Extended Geometric Trinity of Gravity. The aim is to show that also if dynamics are equivalent, foundations of theories of gravity can be very different.
© The Author(s) 2025
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Funded by SCOAP3.

